182 results for “Canyon County”
Change to a recorded plat · Planning application
Canyon County approved a change to a recorded plat for a 7.36-acre rural residential subdivision lot. The application was filed Feb. 25 and decided March 6.
Rezone · Planning application
The applicant sought a conditional rezone and conditional use permit to allow a contractor shop on the 11.96-acre site, which now has a residence. The request was withdrawn on Dec. 15.
Rezone · Planning application
On March 3, commissioners approved rezoning two parcels totaling about 37 acres, with a development agreement capping average lot size at five acres and an irrigation plan required. A third parcel of about 34 acres was not included in the approval.
Rezone · Planning application
Canyon County approved a modification to an earlier rezone for a 40.84-acre property currently classified as other rural land. The decision came Nov. 6, after the request was filed Feb. 7.
Subdivision · Planning application
The Pheasant Heights preliminary plat would divide a 46.97-acre rural tract that now holds a residence. The Board of County Commissioners is scheduled to hold a public hearing on Oct. 29, 2026.
Rezone · Planning application
The owner sought a conditional rezone from agricultural to light industrial to allow existing businesses, including a UTV accessory shop, a tire business and vinyl wrapping. Staff recommended denial. The application shows as withdrawn on July 21, 2026.
Conditional use · Planning application
Cesar Mena's pool construction business, Pool & Spa by Cesar LLC, can use about one acre of a 7.53-acre farm parcel for storing trucks, equipment and supplies. The county Planning and Zoning Commission approved the permit on March 6, with weekday hours limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. and a sight-obscuring fence and dust…
Conditional use · Planning application
Bighorn Traffic Services sought a conditional use permit to run a contractor shop and vehicle staging area on a 3.42-acre rural parcel, with up to 20 business vehicles. The Canyon County Planning and Zoning Commission denied the request on Jan. 15.
Subdivision · Planning application
The application asks for final plat approval for the Kelly Ridge Subdivision on a 19.03-acre rural tract that now holds a residence. It was filed Jan. 23, 2025, and is still in review.
Conditional use · Planning application
A conditional use permit seeking to allow a special events facility on a 12.39-acre tract that now has a residence was withdrawn. The application was filed Jan. 23, 2025, and the withdrawal was recorded March 12, 2026.
Rezone · Planning application
The county commissioners approved a conditional rezone from agricultural to rural residential on April 14, 2026, limiting the site to three parcels of at least 2 acres, with limits on secondary homes and irrigation requirements.
Variance · Planning application
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied a request to cut the required side setback from 10 feet to 4.73 feet on a 2.55-acre agricultural parcel. The owners wanted to convert an existing building into a second residence. Staff had recommended approval; one neighbor opposed it.
Variance · Planning application
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied a request to cut a required front setback from 20 feet to 10 feet on a 3.58-acre rural property. It was a first step toward turning a shared driveway into a private road serving about four homes. Staff had recommended approval.
Variance · Planning application
The Canyon County Planning and Zoning Commission approved a variance letting an existing agricultural structure sit 3 feet from the southern property line instead of the 10 feet required. The owner must apply for a building permit within 30 days of the Mar. 19 decision.
Variance · Planning application
The Canyon County Planning and Zoning Commission approved Austin Emry's request to cut the front setback from 30 feet to 3 feet, allowing an addition built without permits. He must apply for a building permit within 30 days of the Jan. 15 approval.
Vacation · Planning application
Commissioners approved the vacation on Apr. 21 with conditions. The owner must record an amended survey keeping standard utility easements, including 16 feet along the street, and show taxes are paid. The easement had been used for livestock.
Subdivision · Planning application
The final plat for the Bad River Subdivision is under review by the county. The land is currently irrigated farmland, and the filing does not say how many lots or homes are planned.
Private road · Planning application
Canyon County commissioners approved renaming the private road on July 14, with conditions. The owners must install a road sign meeting highway district standards and give the county proof within 60 days of the signed order.
Private road · Planning application
Canyon County commissioners approved renaming the private road, which serves four parcels, from Rifle Ridge Lane on Dec. 11. The approval requires a road sign and a shared road maintenance agreement among property owners.
Private road · Planning application
Canyon County commissioners approved the name change on Aug. 26, and the request adds no homes or buildings. Conditions include engineer-certified construction, a highway-standard road sign verified within 90 days, and written fire district approval for roads longer than 150 feet.
Comprehensive plan amendment · Planning application
Canyon County is considering adding two Highway District No. 4 road improvement and traffic impact fee plans to its 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, and the Board of County Commissioners must still act.
Code amendment · Planning application
The changes redefine parcel and lot, set standards for buildable property and end the non-viable farmland division option. Agencies and neighbors would be notified of splits. The Planning and Zoning Commission hearing is set for Nov. 6.
Code amendment · Planning application
Canyon County commissioners approved an ordinance that trims the land around Wilder where the city expects to grow and may later annex, to meet a 2024 state law update. The boundary was reduced from the city's earlier request, and it now extends roughly a quarter to a third of a mile from city limits.
Code amendment · Planning application
Commissioners adopted a new boundary for the land outside Star's city limits where the city plans for future growth, after trimming a northern expansion to stay within two miles. The disputed overlap with Nampa was left outside both cities' boundaries; the board acted Nov. 19.
