182 results for “Canyon County”
Code amendment · Planning application
The Canyon County commissioners adopted a smaller area of impact map for the City of Parma on Nov. 13, the zone where future growth and annexation are planned. The adopted boundary includes commercial land along the Highway 95 corridor and three University of Idaho parcels north of town.
Code amendment · Planning application
The Canyon County commissioners approved a new, smaller boundary for the land outside Notus city limits that the city plans for future growth and possible annexation, following a 2024 state law. The action describes no specific homes, buildings or lot sizes.
Code amendment · Planning application
The county commissioners adopted a final boundary map for Nampa's area of impact, the unincorporated land the city expects to grow into, and amended county code to match on Nov. 19. A strip near the Boise River shared with Star was left outside both cities' areas of impact.
Code amendment · Planning application
The county approved Ordinance 25-020 on Nov. 24, redrawing the land outside Middleton city limits where the city plans to grow and eventually annex. The new map is smaller than the city requested, mainly because its sewer and water systems cannot yet serve a larger area, and it approves no specific buildings.
Code amendment · Planning application
The county adopted an ordinance shrinking the land south of Melba where the city has planning influence, covering about 585 acres, as required by a 2024 state law update. The change sets a boundary only and does not approve any buildings or homes.
Code amendment · Planning application
The City of Homedale asked Canyon County to confirm its area of impact, the land outside city limits where it plans for future growth. Commissioners denied the request on Oct. 16, finding the city could not show it was very likely to annex the land within five years, mainly because sewer service would have to cross…
Code amendment · Planning application
Canyon County commissioners approved a smaller boundary for the land around Greenleaf where the city expects to grow and may later annex, as required by a 2024 state law. The new boundary cuts 1.5 to 2.7 miles on each side from the previous line, which had been in place since 1994.
Code amendment · Planning application
The county approved an ordinance on Nov. 12 confirming and modifying the boundary of the unincorporated land around Caldwell where the city has a planning say, replacing the older map in county code. The change was required by a 2024 state law with a Dec. 31, 2025 deadline.
Comprehensive plan amendment · Planning application
Ten fire districts and Highway District No. 4 asked to add an appendix listing their capital improvement plans to the county's 2030 plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, and commissioners heard the request Sep. 2. No decision is on file.
Development agreement · Planning application
A development agreement is under review for a property currently classified as other rural land. The filing does not say what would be built, and review is still in progress.
Appeal · Planning application
The Canyon County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Oct. 21 on an appeal of an administrative decision. The site is currently irrigated pasture. The application details are redacted in the documents on file.
Appeal · Planning application
A neighbor is challenging the county planning director's July approval of the split. County commissioners held a hearing on the appeal Sept. 30; staff recommended upholding the approval. No decision is on file.
Appeal · Planning application
Best Investments, LLC had sought to split an 81.29-acre agricultural parcel into eight lots served by a new private road. After the county denied the request in July 2025, the company appealed, and the appeal was withdrawn following a Jan. 6 hearing before county commissioners.
Appeal · Planning application
The owner wants the county to reverse a March denial of a request to divide the irrigated farmland into two residential lots and one farm-only lot, with a narrower access easement. A hearing was held Oct. 6; no decision is on file.
